Villaraigosa's Green Colors School Board Runoff
The mayor's candidates have amassed huge war chests, records
By Howard Blume, Times Staff Writer
For the few out there listening, Neal Kleiner has a
compelling story to tell in his bid to win election to the
Los Angeles Board of Education.
The energetic, Spanish-fluent, 60-year-old father of
biracial children (he's white, his ex-wife African
American) heads a family of educators that encompasses the
city's diversity.
But Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is endorsing - and funding -
the other candidate in the May 15 runoff election, Richard
Vladovic, who has a competitive pitch of his own. And that
makes Vladovic the presumed favorite in the race for
District 7, which stretches from Watts to the Harbor
area.
Villaraigosa is the main reason Vladovic has raised seven
times as much as Kleiner, according to financial disclosure
reports filed Thursday. And Villaraigosa is pouring even
more money into a tightly contested race in the San
Fernando Valley. If both of his candidates win, the mayor
will, for the first time, hold a majority on the
seven-member school board. And Villaraigosa would, after
more than a year and several abortive tries, finally have
increased influence over L.A. Unified, the nation's
second-largest school system.
In the March primary, Villaraigosa and his allies backed
four candidates. One won; one lost. Two others finished
first, but lacked a majority, forcing the runoff.
Kleiner's qualifications include 38 years in the local
trenches - as teacher, counselor, athletic coordinator,
dean of students and assistant principal - before retiring
last fall as a principal. His notable fans include teachers
who worked for him at Muir Middle School in South Los
Angeles.
So far Kleiner has raised about $60,000, including a
$10,000 personal loan. Vladovic has pulled in more than
$550,000, at least $243,000 directly from the Partnership
for Better Schools, a Villaraigosa-controlled campaign
committee.
The mayor's fundraising also is blanketing District 3 in
the San Fernando Valley. There, another major player, the
teachers union, is backing one-term incumbent and longtime
union activist Jon M. Lauritzen. United Teachers Los
Angeles, which has borrowed money to fund the race, has no
plans to match the mayor dollar for dollar. Instead, UTLA
pins its hopes on teachers - both as a sales force and in
the voting booth.
Still, UTLA has thrown in $900,000, the lion's share of
Lauritzen's $1.03-million draw. Challenger Tamar Galatzan
has about $2.35 million, with more than $2 million coming
from the mayor's committee.
Having the mayor of Los Angeles against him suggested
another potentially compelling theme to Kleiner - pitching
himself as independent.
"I want to work with the mayor," said Kleiner, "but not
under his thumb. I see myself as a swing vote."
Vladovic, 62, also cites local ties and deep experience. A
near-lifelong district resident, the retired Army Reserve
major rose over three decades from teacher to senior
administrator. He left L.A. Unified to become
superintendent at West Covina Unified in 2003, then retired
after less than three years, because of the commute and
health concerns that, he said, have since proved
unfounded.
Vladovic's war chest includes substantial funds from unions
outside the school district. Vladovic has diligently
courted labor - and the mayor's backing helps, given that
the teachers union is sitting out the race. That
effectively makes Villaraigosa the power broker.
In recent months, Vladovic spoke in favor of legislation
aimed at giving Villaraigosa substantial authority over the
school district.
The courts have thus far found the Villaraigosa-backed law
to be unconstitutional.
"Some of those schools are so poor in terms of student
achievement and safety issues," said Vladovic, "that the
mayor's involvement can only help."
In the Valley, Galatzan, 37, a neighborhood prosecutor for
the city attorney's office and the parent of two
preschoolers, has expressed consistent general support for
the mayor's agenda -which would reduce her authority on the
school board. Her essential consonance with the mayor, she
said, is their shared sense of urgency for bringing rapid
change to L.A. Unified.
Lauritzen also has a patron to answer to - the teachers
union, whose endorsement has drawn significant help from
other labor groups, in dollars and phone banking.
The 68-year-old incumbent can't keep pace with Galatzan in
TV ads or campaign mail. He'll rely instead on teachers to
fan out into the community from the schools in which they
work. And then, according to the game plan, those teachers
- and their spouses - also will vote for Lauritzen. So many
teachers and district employees live in District 3 that
they alone could make the difference in this low-turnout
election. But in the March primary, they, too, failed to
show in decisive numbers.
The expensive politicking also can turn off voters.
Some have complained about the negative tone of a few
Lauritzen mailers. One bizarrely linked Galatzan, a Jewish
Democrat who once worked for the Anti-Defamation League,
with conservative Christian evangelicals.
But disenchanted voters also are leaning the other way.
Retired bank branch manager Darlene Burton criticized the
school system yet she's going for Lauritzen, partly, she
said, "because I get so much information and mail from
Galatzan - it's about four to one. She has to have a lot of
money behind her. What do they want?"
The donors to Villaraigosa's committee have included the
civic-minded and those with business before the city. By
law, he's not required to post an updated list of
contributors until July.
See the article on Los Angeles Times website